Skip to main content
A vessel in dry dock with a technician working from scaffolding at the stern, propeller and draft marks visible.
THE HELIX METHOD

Every stage earns
the next step.

Assessment, interpretation, advice, execution and verification. A connected workflow with a practical output and a decision point at each stage.

ASSESSMENT / INSPECTION / REPAIR

HELIX is how the proposed scope connects evidence to action. It does not mean every assignment needs every stage, or that repair must always be the outcome.

01

Assess.

Establish the condition before changing it. Review the operating history, document visible damage, measure the component and identify the inspections needed.

The output

A documented baseline, initial findings and a defined inspection scope.

The decision point

Do we have enough reliable evidence to move forward?

02

Analyze.

Bring the findings together. Consider geometry, surface condition, inspection results and the available OEM criteria. Separate confirmed evidence from possible contributors.

The output

A technical interpretation with uncertainties and further investigation needs identified.

The decision point

What is known, what is uncertain and what must be checked?

03

Advise.

Compare the available options before committing to work. Consider repair feasibility, operational constraints, technical risk and the requirements for acceptance.

The output

A recommended route, alternatives and a proposed scope for customer review.

The decision point

Which option is justified by the evidence and approved scope?

04

Execute.

Carry out the agreed repair with the appropriate personnel, tooling and inspection checkpoints, on-site or at the Miami workshop. Raise new findings before changing an approved scope.

The output

A controlled repair record and documented checks during execution.

The decision point

Has the work followed the approved scope and acceptance criteria?

05

Verify.

Check the completed work against the agreed criteria. Record final dimensions and applicable inspection results, and identify any outstanding requirements.

The output

A closeout package supporting the customer and relevant technical reviewers.

The decision point

What evidence supports acceptance of the completed work?

Technical judgment, made visible

The method supports
the decision.

Some findings call for more testing. Some components belong in a workshop. Some should not be repaired. The process should make those distinctions clear before unnecessary work begins.

Measured work. Documented findings.

Dimensional reports, wear measurements, surface finish and hardness results, and repair recommendations support the inspection and machining record.

Start at the assessment

Project requirements take priority.
The scope, applicable procedures, acceptance criteria and stakeholder review requirements must be established for the actual equipment and assignment.

Start with what you know.

Tell us the equipment, location and symptoms. Let us help define the next technical step.

Discuss your situation